Ninth Circuit Recognizes First Amendment Protections for Bloggers On Jan. 17, 2014; This is the "First Ruling" Granting this Protection to BLOGGERS.

"First RULING to Grant Protection to Bloggers."

"Bloggers achieved a significant victory when the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held on Jan. 17, 2014 that First Amendment protections in defamation lawsuits extend to bloggers. 

In April 2014, a Florida appellate court held that bloggers were entitled to pre-suit notices for defamation suits under Florida law.

 Although the victories are welcome news to online content producers everywhere, the jailing of an Alabama blogger has raised questions and concerns among free speech advocates. 

Online speakers may still have obstacles to overcome before courts fully recognize that First Amendment protections apply to them.

Ninth Circuit Recognizes First Amendment Protections for Bloggers On Jan. 17, 2014, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that bloggers receive the same First Amendment protections as institutional media in defamation lawsuits. Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox, 740 F.3d 1284 (9th Cir. 2014).

......
The district court held that only one blog post could be interpreted as containing a statement of fact, and could proceed to trial. Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox, 812 F. Supp. 2d 1220 (D. Or. 2011). 


The remaining blog posts were considered constitutionally protected opinions because they did not contain provable statements of fact. Cox also claimed protection under Oregon’s journalist’s shield law, but District Judge Marco A. Hernandez held that she did not meet the definitions of who can receive protection as laid out by the state statute. (For more information on Cox’s shield law claims, see “Defamation Lawsuits Pose Threat to Journalists as Online Communication Complicates First Amendment Analysis” in the Spring 2012 issue of the Silha Bulletin).

Cox also made First Amendment arguments that the liability standards should be governed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc, 418 U.S. 323 (1974). In Gertz, the Supreme Court held that a private plaintiff needs to show only negligence to recover actual damages from a media defendant.

But a plaintiff can only recover presumed or punitive damages upon a showing that a media defendant acted with “actual malice,” meaning that the statements were made with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of the truth. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. Cox argued that, under Gertz, Padrick and Obsidian carried the burden of proving her negligence in order to recover actual damages for defamation.

Cox also argued that Padrick and Obsidian must show that she acted with actual malice to receive presumed damages. Judge Hernandez dismissed these arguments, stating that Cox had not proven that she was a journalist. Therefore, the protections of Gertz did not apply to her.

....

At the conclusion of the trial, a jury returned verdicts in favor of Padrick and Obsidian. Cox moved for a new trial, which the district court denied. Cox then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that the district court had ruled incorrectly on the liability standards and Padrick’s and Obsidian’s public figure status. Padrick and Obsidian filed a cross-appeal contending that the jury should have considered their defamation claims relating to the other blog posts.

In a unanimous decision, the Ninth Circuit panel reversed the district court’s judgment against Cox. The court held that Gertz’s liability rules were not limited only to situations that involved traditional media defendants. The opinion by Judge Andrew Hurwitz explained that although the Supreme Court has never ruled that the Gertz standard applied to others besides institutional media, the Court’s language in the opinion also did not limit the ruling to institutional media alone. 


Hurwitz wrote, “[the Supreme Court] has repeatedly refused in non-defamation contexts to accord greater First Amendment protection to the institutional media than to other speakers,” citing several cases in which the high court declined to create a distinction between members of the press and the general public.

As a result, the court agreed with other circuits that “the First Amendment defamation rules in Sullivan and its progeny apply equally to the institutional press and individual speakers.” The court also noted that trying to create a distinction between institutional media and other communicators was very difficult. 

Therefore, the court said that the key First Amendment factor under Gertz in defamation cases was not the identity of the speaker. Rather, “the public-figure status of a plaintiff and the public importance of the statement at issue” are the key First Amendment considerations. Through this rationale, Cox, as a blogger, was entitled to the same liability standards that traditional forms of media received under the First Amendment.

In addition to determining that Sullivan and Gertz protections apply to the general public, the appeals court also rejected the argument that Gertz was limited to defamation cases involving matters of public concern. Hurwitz wrote that even if Gertz was limited to such a situation, Cox’s blog posts concerned public matters qualifying for protection.  ....

Several First Amendment advocates and advocacy organizations praised the Ninth Circuit’s ruling. 

UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, who represented Cox during the appeals process, told Associated Press reporter Jeff Barnard for a Jan. 17, 2014 article that the decision “makes clear that bloggers have the same First Amendment rights as professional journalists.” 

Volokh also noted that the decision followed similar court rulings that granted First Amendment protections to other writers and book authors,although this ruling appeared to be the first to grant protection to bloggers. 

In the same article, Gregg Leslie, the legal defense director for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP), said the ruling confirmed the fact that Gertz was “not a special right to the news media.” Rather, it applied to everyone. “So it’s a good thing for bloggers and citizen journalists and others,” Leslie said."

Source and Full Article
http://silha.umn.edu/news/WinterSpring2014/SILHACENTERBloggersFirstAmendmentUniversityofMinnesota.html

More at
http://ninthcircuitcrystalcoxappeal.blogspot.com/

EXPOSE Corruption via BLOG. You are Media. You are the NEWS. a Bit about the "Muckraker". Expose Corruption Folks, Stand Up, Stand OUT. Be a "Muckraker"

"The term muckraker refers to reform-minded journalists who wrote largely for all popular magazines and continued a tradition of investigative journalism reporting; muckrakers often worked to expose social ills and corporate and political corruption. 

Muckraking magazines—notably McClure's of publisher S. S. McClure—took on corporate monopolies and crooked political machines while raising public awareness of chronic urban poverty, unsafe working conditions, and social issues like child labor.

The muckrakers are most commonly associated with the Progressive Era period of American history. The journalistic movement emerged in the United States after 1900 and continued to be influential until World War I, when the movement came to an end through a combination of advertising boycotts, dirty tricks and patriotism.^[1]

Before World War I, the term "muckraker" was used to refer in a general sense to a writer who investigates and publishes truthful reports to perform an auditing or watchdog function. 

In contemporary use, the term describes either a journalist who writes in the adversarial or alternative tradition, or a non-journalist whose purpose in publication is to advocate reform and change.^[2] Investigative journalists view the muckrakers as early influences and a continuation of watchdog journalism.

The term is a reference to a character in John Bunyan's classic Pilgrim's Progress, "the Man with the Muck-rake" that rejected salvation to focus on filth. It became popular after PresidentTheodore Roosevelt referred to the character in a 1906 speech; Roosevelt acknowledged that "the men with the muck rakes are often indispensable to the well being of society; but only if they know when to stop raking the muck..."

Source and Lot's More

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker

"Ida Minerva Tarbell (November 5, 1857 – January 6, 1944) was an American teacher, author and journalist. She was one of the leading "muckrakers" of the progressive era. She wrote many notable magazine series and biographies. She is best known for her 1904 book The History of the Standard Oil Company, which was listed as No. 5 in a 1999 list by New York University of the top 100 works of 20th-century American journalism.^[1] She depicted John D. Rockefeller as crabbed, miserly, money-grabbing, and viciously effective at monopolizing the oil trade."

Source and Lot's More

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Tarbell

"The Brass Check is a muckraking exposé of American journalism by Upton Sinclair published in 1919. It focuses mainly on newspapers and the Associated Press wire service, along with a few magazines. Other critiques of the press had appeared, but Sinclair reached a wider audience with his personal fame and lively, provocative writing style.^[1] Among those critiqued was William Randolph Hearst, who made routine use of yellow journalism in his widespread newspaper and magazine business.

Sinclair called The Brass Check "the most important and most dangerous book I have ever written."(p. 429) ^[2] The University of Illinois Press released a new edition of the book in 2003, which contains a preface by Robert McChesney and Ben Scott.

The text is also freely available on the Internet, as Sinclair opted not to copyright the text in an effort to maximize its readership.

For much of Sinclair's career he was known as a "two book author": for writing The Jungle and The Brass Check.^[3] Sinclair organized ten printings of The Brass Check in its first decade and sold over 150,000 copies. To maximize his readership, he did not take advantage of the opportunity to copyright the book.^[3]"

^{Source and More}

^{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brass_Check}

^"Upton Beall Sinclair, Jr. (September 20, 1878 – November 25, 1968), was an American author who wrote close to one hundred books in many genres. He achieved popularity in the first half of the twentieth century, acquiring particular fame for his classic muckraking novel, The Jungle (1906). 

It exposed conditions in the U.S. meat packing industry, causing a public uproar that contributed in part to the passage a few months later of the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act.^[1] In 1919, he published The Brass Check, amuckraking exposé of American journalism that publicized the issue of yellow journalism and the limitations of the “free press” in the United States. Four years after the initial publication of The Brass Check, the first code of ethics for journalists was created.^[2] Time magazine called him "a man with every gift except humor and silence."^[3] In 1943, he won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.

Sinclair also ran unsuccessfully for Congress as a Socialist, and was the Democratic Party nominee for Governor of California in 1934, though his highly progressive campaign was defeated rather soundly."

Source and More

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upton_Sinclair

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari; Supreme Court of the United States Filing; Crystal Cox v. Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al; No. 13-9731

Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal L. Cox; 

Supreme Court of the United States Filing;
Crystal Cox v. Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al; No. 13-9731

No. 13-9731

Crystal Cox, Petitioner
v.
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al.

Docketed: April 16, 2014

Lower Court: 
United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  Case Nos.: (12-35238, 12-35319)
  Decision Date: January 17, 2014
  Rehearing Denied: March 5, 2014

Apr 8 2014 Petition for a Writ of Certiorari and 

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. 

(Response due May 16, 2014)

Attorneys for Petitioner:
Crystal L. Cox P.O. Box 2027
Port Townsend, WA  98368
Party name: Crystal Cox
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13-9731.htm




To Read the writ of certiorari Filing by Crystal Cox, Pro Se, Click Below
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yBV1MgaxPbjqoYxC3op2241oidez4pEW2WJ2P-Lg8Hk/edit

UCLA, Law Professor, Attorney Eugene Volokh Motion to Rehear

Click Below

http://www.scribd.com/doc/204438383/Eugene-Volokh-Motion-to-Rehear-Obsidian-v-Cox


Other Links for Updates

https://certpool.com/dockets/13-9731

Crystal Cox v. Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al., No. 13-9731

More on the Crystal Cox Blogger; Crystal Cox First Amendment Case, 

Equality of Bloggers; Ninth Circuit Appeals WIN for ALL Citizen Journalists,

 Anti-Corruption Bloggers, and Whistleblowers

http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/

http://ninthcircuitcrystalcoxappeal.blogspot.com/

More on Obsidian Finance Group

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/

http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/

http://kevinpadrick.blogspot.com/

Ted Bernstein of Life Insurance Concepts, Tescher and Spallina Law Firm, Robert Spallina, Donald Tescher, and Florida Notary Kimberly Morane Florida Insurance Scam and Estate Fraud, Forgery Case, overseeing Judge is Judge Martin H. Colin.

"Kimberly Moran Florida Notary Public, Tescher and Spallina Law Firm involved
 in Forgery and Estate Fraud

Kimberly Moran Florida Notary Public, Tescher and Spallina Law Firm ( Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher ), Ted Bernstein of Life Insurance Concepts and the Bernstein Family Foundation are involved in Estate Fraud, Insurance Schemes, Fraud on the Courts, Forgery, Possible Murder and other illegal and unethical behavior. The Judge in the Case is Judge Martin H. Colin.

Kimberly Moran Florida Notary Public of Tescher and Spallina Law Firm,  Robert Spallina, Donald Tescher, Ted Bernstein of Life Insurance Concepts sure seems to have a lot of explaining to do, check out the forgery, fraud on the courts, flat out lies and for some reason none of these folks are in jail.  The Judge in the Case is Judge Martin H. Colin, we will be watching to see if he follows through with those Miranda Rights and to see if Kimberly Moran, who is already confirmed to have committed forgery, sees any jail time and how this Notary at a law firm got such a high priced criminal attorney ?

Take a look at the details of this Florida Estate Fraud, Forgery, Real Estate Fraud, Child Endangerment, Fraud on the Courts and Possible Murder Case is playing out.

Kimberly Moran, Florida Notary Public involved in Fraud, Forgery, Estate Fraud ..
Motion to Freeze Assets in Shirley Bernstein Estate
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkia3dyOGs4MnowODg/edit

ARREST has been made in the Estate of Shirley for FRAUDULENT NOTARIZATIONS and admitted FORGERIES of five documents in our names and one in our father’s name, which was FORGED POST MORTEM for him by Donald and Roberts Legal Assistant and Notary Public, Kimberly Moran.
http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2013/12/response-to-ted-and-donald-letters-re.html

Kimberly Moran State of Florida Notary Suspension
http://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/orders/2013/13_291_moran.pdf

Court Petition Naming Kimberly Moran, Florida Notary Publichttp://www.docstoc.com/docs/160162877/Ted-Bernstein-Petition

RESPONSE TO TED and DONALD LETTERS RE EMERGENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THREE MINOR CHILDREN AND MORE
http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2013/12/response-to-ted-and-donald-letters-re.html

Additional Respondents Added
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicnFEdTI5Zktlc00/edit

More information on this Estate Fraud, Forgery, Fraud on the Courts Case

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2013/12/does-ted-bernstein-not-understand-truth.html

Insurance Schemes and Fraud on the Court, Ted Bernstein
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=165105099&key=undefined&pass=undefined

"NOTICE OF MOTION TO RE-OPEN  BASED ON FRAUD ON THE COURT"

"That Case No. 502012CA013933XXXX, Stansbury v. Ted Bernstein et al. is a lawsuit with a claim against the estate, where RICO Defendant Greenberg Traurig acts as counsel to Plaintiff’s brother Theodore. However, after Plaintiff points out to his brother and Spallina that Greenberg Traurig is conflicted with assets of the estates, including but not limited to the approximate 30% interests held in the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Intellectual Properties and this RICO lawsuit, Greenberg Traurig suddenly withdraws as counsel in the matter, months after the lawsuit was instituted"

Source and Full Document
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130512%20FINAL%20Motion%20to%20Rehear%20and%20Reopen%20Obstruction%20of%20Justice165555%20WITH%20EXHIBITS.pdf

Hearing Transcript where Judge Martin H. Colin clearly knows of fraud on the courts, and has yet to actually follow through with the threatened reading of the Miranda rights.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkia3NzaDd1NG45aUk/edit

Lawsuit filed against Ted Bernstein
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiWnBNVUtJUEFJRms/edit

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2013/08/ted-bernstein-life-insurance-concepts.html "

Source of Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher, Tescher and Spallina Law Firm, Ted Bernstein of Life Insurance Concepts, Greg Geffen Attorney Signature Title, Florida Notary Kimberly Moran and Judge Martin H. Colin post.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1072355

Donald Tescher on the Far Right

Check out the Documents in this Florida Estate Case. The overseeing judge is Judge Martin H. Colin who "almost" read the attorneys their Miranda Rights. We have forgery, fraud, dead people signing documents, possible murder, sibling rivalry and all the makings of a Law and Order mini series. Read these document, and decide for yourself who is committing fraud, who is lying, who is telling the truth, who is abiding the law and take a deep look as to whether you want to buy insurance from Ted Bernstein of Life Insurance Concepts, or have your Estate "Handled" by what sure looks to me to be crooks who will do as they please after you die, regardless of your wishes.

Donald Tescher in the Middle

More Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher, Tescher and Spallina Law Firm, Ted Bernstein of Life Insurance Concepts, Greg Geffen Attorney Signature Title, and Florida Notary Kimberly Moran seem to be involved in a massive Florida Insurance Scam and Estate Fraud Case, overseeing judge is Judge Martin H. Colin. research links

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2013/12/response-to-ted-and-donald-letters-re.html

Petition to Freeze Bernstein Assets
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTzBGbkdSTXI4MEU/edit?usp=sharing

Motion to Remove Personal Representative
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNFdEOWo3ZnhHMEU/edit?usp=sharing

Response to Florida Governor in Kimberly Moran Notary Fraud, Forgery Case
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiOVFPR0I0YllQUFU/edit?usp=sharing

Forgery, Fraud on the Courts, Sanctions
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiRDZGYjVlVnVoQm8/edit?usp=sharing

Kimberly Moran Notary Fraud, Forgery Case. Kimberly Moran of Tescher and Spallina Law Firm response on Notary Fraud whereby she forged the signature of a deceased man to enrich her bosses Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher and DENY the true, moral and legal wishes of those whose Estate Robert Spallina and Donald Tescher were handling the affairs and assets of.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTmd6Q2VnRVpDdWM/edit?usp=sharing

Notary Public Comparison of Signatures and Dates, Evidence in Kimberly Moran Notary of Tescher and Spallina Law Firm Fraud, Forgery Case
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU2FsT0hfVEhocWM/edit?usp=sharing

TESCHER & SPALLINA, P.A., (AND ALL PARTNERS,  ASSOCIATES AND OF COUNSEL); ROBERT L. SPALLINA,  (BOTH PERSONALLY & PROFESSIONALLY); DONALD  R. TESCHER (BOTH PERSONALLY & PROFESSIONALLY);  THEODORE STUART BERNSTEIN (AS ALLEGED PERSONAL  REPRESENTATIVE, TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE) (BOTH      PERSONALLY & PROFESSIONALLY);  Emergency Hearing Judge Martin Colin Court.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkia3ZTZWNEczNxaE0/edit?usp=sharing

Jackson Response to Bernstein Trust Requests
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibWlpdmNoQ21YcmM/edit?usp=sharing

In March of 2012 Donald Tescher was awarded by the " MITZVAH SOCIETY" for allegedly being a "CARING ESTATE PLANNING PROFESSIONALS". 

Yet it is clear from the court documents above, that Donald Tescher and TESCHER & SPALLINA, P.A will do as they please after you die, regardless of what your TRUE wishes are and regardless of how much you pay him, or to what lengths, efforts and legal means you go to prepare your ESTATE to be handled per your wishes. 

And it sure seems that the JUDGES in Florida will assist Tescher and Spallina, even if they are involved in clear fraud, forgery and acting outside of the law and the wishes of their clients estate plans.

Edgar J. Steele: the North Idaho Edgar J. Steele Story. Congressional Testimony: Cyndi Steele to Bill Windsor of Lawless America regarding Edgar Steele Idaho Attorney Framed by Idaho Corruption.

Cyndi Steele Congressional Testimony Regarding the North Idaho Edgar Steele Story.



".. web site directly addresses the arrest of Edgar J. Steele and his evolving legal battle regarding a “murder-for-hire plot” he is alleged to have undertaken.  Those involved with the content of this site have a keen interest in facts, truth, information gathering and – ultimately – the support and complete exoneration of Mr. Steele leading to a swift release from incarceration.

In the spirit of an America conceived as a Constitutional Republic, endowing free speech and fair, impartial justice upon its citizens, we must all rise from the sidelines to stand with, and for a fellow citizen.  Many believe the America of 2010 – the “great experiment in government” – has run its course and now has devolved into a megalomanical oligarchy, fearful of and abusive to citizens like Mr. Steele. "

Support of North Idaho's Edgar J. Steele

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Free-Edgar-Steele/108956835840391

"The starting point of concern occurred on June 11, 2010 when Mr. Steele was arrested for suspicion of intent to arrange for the murder of his wife and mother-in-law.  Much of the current knowledge on this case has been gleaned from the print and broadcast media of north Idaho and eastern Washington state.  Aggressive negative bias against Mr. Steele is found in nearly every news report thus far issued. The reader is advised to take general media output with more than a grain of salt."

Source of Edgar J. Steele Information
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/background/

".. a one-stop location for Edgar’s writings. If installment have been updated by him, they will be posted here. "

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/complaint/

Edgar J. Steele definitive non-fiction work “Defensive Racism” is now available!  Please visit www.defensiveracism.com "

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/book/

Free Edgar J. Steele Videos for More Information
http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/ussc/



Idaho Anti-Corruption - Free Edgar Steele



Idaho Free Speech.  Make a Stand Against Corruption in Idaho



Edgar Steele Interview




Free Edgar Steele, Click Here for More Information

Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

MarcRandazza.com, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. MarcRandazza.com and the War with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and Internet Savvy Blogger Crystal Cox Rages On. MarcRandazza.com is the domain name that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was just not SAVVY enough to Buy. So Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is fighting Free Speech Rights of all, so that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group can STEAL MarcRandazza.com. Expose Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Email your Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tip to Blogger Crystal Cox.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, an unEthical Attorney.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza had a phone interview with me, Blogger Crystal Cox, to determine if Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza wanted or could take the Obsidian Finance Vs. Crystal Cox case on appeal.

After Crystal Cox spoke with Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, I bought MarcRandazza.com, because it was available and I wanted to use the domain name to further the cause of the case and Free Speech rights.

Then, soon after this call, in a highly unethical manner, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, without letting Crystal Cox know that he was doing so, or even representing her.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave away privileged information, negotiated my case and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group gave private information.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not contact me to let me know he represented me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told members of the First Amendment bar that he, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent Crystal Cox.

Meanwhile, I Crystal Cox Blogger, had picked another attorney who had previously contacted me. This attorney contacted Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group about his yapping to the First Amendment Bar in representing me.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed, indeed that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox, me. Which was in no way True. 

Just after this conversation Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza sent me, Crystal L. Cox an email saying that he Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group would represent me Crystal Cox on appeal.

I told Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group that I did not want Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group to represent me, as I had chose another attorney who had treated me with dignity and respect.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group pretended to be fine with this decision. And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told me that all was fine with it. We had spoke previously about my marketing abilities.

And so about a month after Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group acted as if he was fine that I chose another attorney, I emailed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and asked Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group if he had use for internet marketing in his business. He said he did not need internet marketing for his firm and he demanded that I give him MarcRandazza.com, even though Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had never bought that domain name in all these years as an alleged Internet Lawyer and Domain Name Expert, Hmmm !!!!

When I refused to Give him the domain name, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group got very mad and threatened me. He said you really want to make an enemy of me, in that purely mafia style threatening manner. After this, to teach me a lesson Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group  conspired with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set me up for Extortion.

And Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had no proof that any such thing happened. In fact, blogger Crystal Cox, me, had not written anything to EXPOSE Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group offered to join the Plaintiff and set up his own alleged client.

Blogger Crystal Cox NEVER offered to remove anything she had written online about Marc Randazza for MONEY. I even refused his offer to buy the Domain Name.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group continues to lie and claim that blogger Crystal Cox, me, wanted money to remove information. However Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is flat out lying. I had not written one word about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group until he conspired to set me up and harm me and I defended myself in the search engines.

 I felt extremely compelled to set the record RIGHT, get my side of the story in the search engines and to expose Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and how he treats his clients.

How can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group justify using his alleged clients information to set them up for things they did not do and how can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group use information he was given in confidence as a weapon to ruin the life of his client, or client to be?

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's hypocritical actions led me to buy more Domain Names to make fun of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and his lack of knowledge in Domain Name Law, Intellectual Property and Free Speech rights as proven by the fact that he never bought that domain name, and that he got my blogs and accounts shut down to suppress MY free speech. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group even filed for a protective order out of Las Vegas in order to suppress Free Speech.

It sure seems that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will go to any lengths to SUPPRESS Free Speech. If that Free Speech is about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group defends others to have the same right to own domain names with other people's name in it. Seriously, it is blatantly obvious that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is a hypocrite.

How in the world can Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claim to be an advocate of Free Speech when Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has done everything he can, short of taking my life, in order to suppress my Free Speech Rights.

To further my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was ill equipped at domain name law, I purchased the domain name of his child and his wife. Of which I created a Blog on JenniferRandazza.com, to, again prove that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not have the skills he proclaimed to have in this Internet Legal World. The other domain name, was NEVER, ever published in any way by me. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group flat out lied to big media and claimed that I did publish this domain name. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group painted blogger Crystal Cox, me, in False Light deliberatly. Yet, Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has no accountability.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group ruins lives. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group spreads lies about his clients and ex-clients and with seemingly no remorse.

After having made my point that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is an Idiot. I, Blogger Crystal Cox deleted the domain name that allegedly was dumbass Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's darkest hour of terror. And I gave away JenniferRandazza.com, the name of the wife of Free Speech / Domain Name Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's wife.  I gave the name away to further the cause of exposing injustice in the Porn Industry and to help expose stalking and activities of those connected to Randazza Legal Group's J. Malcolm Devoy.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is said to have stolen that domain name from a GoDaddy Account, with the help of a Godaddy Employee Allegedly.

I gave MarcRandazza.com to the same person for the same reasons. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group seemed to have threatened this person and even posted on chat sites the persons car and make of care and wishing them death. So in fear they returned the domain name to me. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group then filed an Arbritration complaint to steal the Domain name MarcRandazza.com that  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group  was to dumb to buy.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an Advocate of Free Speech, however, Blogger Crystal Cox knows that to be an absolute falsehood.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group  shut down one of my Google accounts, simply because I made fun of and exposed Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group had my wordpress blogs shut down because Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not like me exposing the actions, hypocrisy and butt hurt of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to Forbes regarding Crystal Cox.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has lied to the world about me. Nothing I can do but tell the Truth, the whole Truth and have Faith.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lied to a national radio program regarding the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claimed in the Sandra Fluke case that Butthurt does not pay. Yet Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and stealing intellectual property over it.  Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is butthurt and ruining lives over it.

Do your homework BEFORE you even speak to Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.  Blogger Crystal Cox claims that Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has so many connections that the law and the constitution is irrelevant. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group lies to big media and they eat it up. Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group whines to anyone who will believe Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's flat out lies.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has inside connections everywhere and will get your blog shut down, will steal your domain names, and Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will violate your constitutional rights, your Free Speech rights. And all under the guise of Free Speech Advocate.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a good man.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an honest attorney.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Free Speech Advocate.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a Truth Teller.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT a domain name law expert.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, NOT an advocate of the Constitutional Rights of All.

Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is, in my Opinion, a hypocrite and will do anything to silence Free Speech when that Free Speech is telling on Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

Do your home work regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.  Find your own facts about Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Read the cases of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and decide for yourself if the actions of Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group against blogger Crystal Cox seem to be hypocritical.

Got a tip regarding Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy? Email your Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy tip to Crystal Cox at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com .

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox is dedicated to EXPOSING Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, and J. Malcolm Devoy.

If Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group OR J. Malcolm Devoy find a way to make me disappear. I trust my readers will take up the reigns in Exposing Marc J. Randazza, Marc John Randazza, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and J. Malcolm Devoy.